Love of What Is
A Stoic philosopher and a student wrestle with memory, trust, and the present moment.
189 genre.works
A Stoic philosopher and a student wrestle with memory, trust, and the present moment.
Who should question what? Does qualification to question exist? Haru, Noa, and Simon debate.
What exists beyond endless questioning? Mio's quiet presence brings Haru and Ren a new perspective.
Reason or emotion—which should we think with? Noa and Haru explore the value of emotional thinking.
Does thinking transform the self? Haru, Ren, and Mio explore the relationship between thought and self-transformation.
What are we doing when we understand others' thoughts? Noa and Simon explore the philosophy of empathy and imagination.
Ren and Simon discuss pretending to know versus acknowledging ignorance. Is admitting ignorance weakness or strength?
Haru and Ren explore the meaning of questioning itself. Does a question without an answer have value? They consider this through dialogue.
Haru and Noa explore the difficulty and importance of questioning the obvious. Is challenging common sense rebellion or inquiry?
Can we think without language? Ren and Simon debate the relationship between language and thought.
What is the thinking subject? Starting from Descartes' 'I think, therefore I am,' Ren and Haru explore the essence of self.
Companions with different perspectives discuss the power that dialogue holds.
Watching Mio who prefers being alone, Haru and Simon reconsider the meaning of solitude.
Facing difficult circumstances, Noa discusses with companions where hope resides.
When Haru grows tired of philosophical questions, Ren and Noa explore the meaning of questioning itself.
Facing sudden loss, Simon explores the meaning of life with his companions.
Watching Mio find small happiness, Ren and Noa debate the nature of happiness.
When Haru gains freedom of choice and struggles with its weight, Noa and Simon explore the relationship between freedom and responsibility.
When Simon faces a friend's betrayal, Haru and Ren debate the nature of responsibility.
After Noa suddenly loses herself to anger, she discusses with companions the relationship between emotion and reason.
When Ren is suddenly overwhelmed by anxiety, a dialogue with Haru explores the relationship between thinking and self.
While observing Mio's silence, Noa and Haru consider the duality of silence. Ethics and meaning of silence.
In an age of information overload, Noa and Haru discuss the relationship between healthy skepticism and trust. Philosophy of epistemology.
Simon and Ren explore the essential purpose of language and communication. Philosophy of the meaning and function of words.
While looking up at cherry blossoms, Noa, Simon and Haru explore the essence of beauty and human aesthetic desire. Philosophy of aesthetics.
Seeing Ren who is logically correct yet isolated, Simon and Haru consider the relationship between justice and harmony. Philosophy of ethics and sociality.
Seeing a senior who gave up on dreams they once spoke of passionately, Noa and Ren discuss the relationship between dreams and reality. Philosophy of hope.
To Haru who holds anxiety about words not being conveyed, Noa and Simon discuss the essence of misunderstanding and limits of understanding others. Philosophy of communication.
Seeing Haru troubled about her future, Ren and Simon discuss the philosophy of emotional wavering and decision-making. The relationship between uncertainty and self.
Haru and Ren discuss the difference between problems to confront and problems to distance from. Philosophy of engaging with reality.
To Haru who received unfair evaluation, Simon and Ren discuss how to face unreasonableness. Philosophy of justice and acceptance.
Ren and Noa discuss the nature of truth. Is truth discovered or constructed?
Mio, Simon, and Haru consider the difference between solitude and isolation. Is being alone freedom or alienation?
Haru, Ren, and Noa discuss the relationship between hedonism and happiness. The difference between temporary pleasure and lasting happiness.
Noa and Simon discuss the value of sadness. Is suffering meaningless, or is it an opportunity for growth?
Ren, Noa, and Haru discuss the essence of sincerity. Which is morally more important: right action or right intention?
Haru, Ren, and Simon discuss the nature of death. Is death the annihilation of existence, or a transition to another form?
Noa, Simon, and Haru discuss eternal recurrence and life's uniqueness. If life repeats, how should we live?
Haru and Ren discuss the nature of emotions. Do emotions arise from the body or from the mind?
Haru, Simon, and Noa discuss the meaning of failure. The balance between learning from mistakes and the cost of mistakes.
Haru, Mio, and Simon consider self-identity. In a continuously changing self, what is 'being oneself'?
Ren, Noa, and Mio discuss the meaning of ugliness. Is it the opposite of beauty, or part of beauty?
Haru, Ren, and Noa discuss the problem of free will. Are choices truly free, or are they determined?
Simon, Ren, and Mio discuss the ethical value of conflict and struggle. Should conflict be avoided, or is it sometimes necessary?
Haru, Simon, and Ren discuss the ideal and reality of equality. Is complete equality possible, or even desirable?
Noa and Haru discuss the origin of fear. Is it instinct, imagination, or proof of intelligence?
Ren and Simon discuss equality and asymmetry in relationships. Is equality an ideal, or an illusion?
Haru and Ren discuss the dual nature of desire. Can the energy that drives humans become both good and evil?
Ren, Noa, and Haru discuss the roots of conflict and struggle. Is it human nature, or social structure?
Noa, Haru, and Simon discuss the standards of beauty. Does objective beauty exist, or is it subjective?
Simon and Ren discuss the essence of courage. Is it the absence of fear, or choice within fear?
Haru and Noa debate reasons for affection, exploring the rationality of emotions and the possibility of love without reasons.
Noa and Ren debate the relationship between choice abundance and happiness, exploring the paradox of choice and the burden that decision-making freedom brings.
Haru and Noa consider the essence of satisfaction, exploring the relationship between goal achievement and happiness, and the value of process.
Ren and Noa debate the essence of correctness, exploring truth, justice, and the position of 'correctness' within pluralistic values.
Noa and Mio observe the transmission mechanisms of rumors, considering information transformation and the power and responsibility of words.
Ren and Simon explore the essence of belief, considering the difference between knowledge and belief, and the basis for conviction.
Haru, Ren, and Simon debate the diversity of justice, exploring justice from different perspectives and the possibility of universal justice.
Haru and Simon discuss humanity's habit of comparison, exploring the origins of social comparison and both the suffering and growth it brings.
Ren, Simon, and Haru explore the psychology of rules and deviation, considering the origins of norms, and the meaning and cost of breaking them.
Ren and Simon explore the psychological mechanisms of disappointment, considering expectations versus reality, and what disappointment teaches us.
Troubled by the weight of choice, Haru explores with Ren and Simon the inseparable relationship between freedom and responsibility, and the meaning of choosing.
Confused by changes in friendship, Haru explores with Simon and Noa the difference between healthy love and unhealthy dependency, and the balance between independence and intimacy.
Observing the ever-calm Mio, Haru and Noa discuss the duality of suppressing anger and the authenticity of emotions.
After an experience of being unable to suppress anger, Haru explores with Noa and Ren the possibilities and limits of emotional control, and the relationship between emotion and reason.
Triggered by an incorrect weather forecast, Haru debates with Ren and Simon about determinism and free will, and the limits of prediction.
After experiencing a day without a watch, Haru explores with Ren and Mio the reasons for obsession with time and the possibility of living unbounded by time.
After accidentally learning a friend's secret, Haru explores with Simon and Noa the happiness of ignorance and the suffering of knowledge. They examine the complex relationship between truth and happiness.
After failing by changing her test answers based on intuition, Haru explores with Noa and Ren the nature of intuition, its limits, and the proper balance with logic.
Feeling something off about conclusions from perfectly logical reasoning, Haru explores with Ren and Simon the limits of logic and the role of human intuition.
Triggered by a rainy day coincidence, Haru and Ren explore the boundary between superstition and causality. They consider the evolutionary significance of pattern recognition and humanity's stance toward uncertainty.
Clarity versus ambiguity, which is richer? Simon and Ren explore the meaning of indeterminacy.
About distance between people. Haru and Noa consider the meaning of closeness and remoteness.
Where does trust come from and how does it break? Ren and Simon discuss the structure and fragility of trust.
Why do people want to be understood? Haru and Noa discuss recognition, loneliness, and the essence of understanding.
What does it mean for the heart to be hurt? Noa and Mio discuss the relationship between fragility and strength.
The ethics of doubt. Ren and Noa discuss the necessity and danger of skepticism.
Is having a need for recognition bad? Simon and Ren debate the duality of this desire.
When choosing someone, what makes them 'right'? Haru and Ren explore the philosophy of choice in relationships.
The limits and possibilities of speaking about oneself. Haru and Simon explore the philosophy of self-expression.
Can we truly understand another's suffering? Ren and Simon discuss the limits and possibilities of empathy.
Spending time alone with Mio, Haru discovers the richness of wordless dialogue. The communicative possibilities that silence holds.
From the experience of knowing the answer but being unable to write it on an exam, Noa and Ren explore the relationship between language and thought.
Discussing the impulse to share good news with someone, Haru and Simon talk about the philosophical meaning of sharing joy.
Watching a friend dealing with heartbreak, Noa and Haru contemplate the persistence of sadness. Why does sadness linger in memory more than joy?
Confused about her future path, Haru asks Ren and Noa about life's purpose. Considering how the presence or absence of purpose affects the way we live.
Does opportunity only visit those who are prepared, or does it come equally to all? Haru and Ren contemplate chance and necessity, and the essence of opportunity.
Mediating a fight between friends, Haru and Simon discover that misunderstanding can actually deepen understanding.
Haru and Mio organizing photos. Erasable digital photos and lasting memories—contemplating the weight and lightness of existence.
Before an old diary found by chance, Simon and Noa debate the origin of meaning. Is meaning discovered or created?
Watching friends during an exam, Ren contemplates the problem of 'rushing to answers.' A dialogue with Haru and Simon.
Ren and Haru debate free will and determinism. Are our choices truly free?
Simon and Mio explore the relationship between effort and results. Questioning the just-world hypothesis.
Ren and Haru debate the essence of hope. Do facing reality and having hope contradict?
Simon and Noa debate the ethics of lying. Is telling the truth always good?
Haru and Mio explore the structure of regret. Why regret when the past cannot be changed?
Ren and Haru debate the quantification of happiness. Are there values that cannot be expressed numerically?
Simon and Haru dialogue about the definition of success. Who measures success?
Ren and Noa explore the ethical aspects of jealousy. Do emotions have good and evil?
Haru and Simon debate the essence of friendship. Are conditional relationships true friendship?
When faced with cognitive dissonance, how do we react? Haru and Ren explore the mechanisms of self-deception.
Haru and Ren consider the essence of forgiveness. They explore the psychology of seeking forgiveness, the meaning of forgiving, and the importance of self-acceptance.
Haru and Simon debate about freedom of choice. They explore the anxiety that too many options bring and the responsibility of making choices.
Noa and Ren debate about imperfection in the art room. They explore the obsession with perfection and the human charm that imperfection brings.
Simon and Mio quietly contemplate the nature of indifference. They explore whether indifference to social issues is morally problematic or psychological self-defense.
Ren and Noa debate the value of individuality. They explore wavering feelings between modern society that emphasizes individuality and traditional values that cherish harmony.
Ren and Noa debate human changeability. They explore how much personality and values can change, and examine resistance to and possibilities of transformation.
Mio and Simon contemplate the relationship between solitude and freedom. They explore the value of being alone and why freedom accompanies solitude.
Ren and Simon debate the nature of competition. They explore the power of competition to foster growth and its simultaneous danger to break people.
Haru and Noa consider the unexpected consequences that well-intentioned actions can bring. They explore how actions done with good intentions can sometimes hurt others.
Haru and Simon discuss fear of change. They explore both the psychology of fearing change and the reality that change is a natural process.
As Haru and Simon explore the meaning of suffering, Ren compares Buddhist and Western philosophical perspectives.
As Noa and Simon explore the definition of love, Mio's silence shows the essence of love beyond words.
As Ren speaks of determinism and Simon connects quantum mechanics with free will, Haru considers practical freedom.
As Noa explores the pursuit of perfection and Mio shows the beauty of imperfection, Haru wavers between perfect and imperfect.
As Haru fears weakness, Noa speaks of the value of vulnerability, and Mio shows the essence of strength through silence.
As Ren logically analyzes courage and Noa speaks of its relationship with fear, Haru discovers everyday courage.
As Simon and Haru discuss the nature of questioning, Mio shows the meaning of questions through silence.
As Ren and Noa discuss the fixity and fluidity of values, Haru considers the balance between growth and consistency.
As Simon speaks of power structures and Ren analyzes the relationship between power and responsibility, Haru understands the duality of power.
As Ren analyzes the structure of anger and Noa speaks of the value of emotions, Haru explores the meaning of anger.
Ren and Noa debate the nature of memory, exploring objective facts and subjective interpretation, and the problem of self-identity.
Haru and Noa discuss the existence of emotions that cannot be put into words, exploring the relationship between language and emotion, and the limits of expression.
Ren and Simon debate the locus of responsibility, exploring individual versus collective responsibility, and the problem of free will versus determinism.
Haru and Noa debate the nature of misunderstanding, exploring communication gaps, sources of diversity, and the relationship with creativity.
Ren and Noa debate the relationship between romance and reason, exploring emotion and logic, intuition and analysis, and the possibility of their harmony.
Everyone debates the power of dialogue, exploring the limits and possibilities of words, understanding and action, and dialogue as hope.
Haru and Simon discuss the meaning of apology, exploring acknowledgment of responsibility, repair of relationships, and the philosophy of forgiveness.
Haru and Simon discuss the concept of ownership, exploring material and spiritual possession, and the relationship with freedom.
Ren and Simon debate the responsibility of ignorance, exploring the ethics of not knowing, the duty to learn, and Socrates' knowledge of ignorance.
Noa and Haru debate the ethics of lying, exploring Kantian deontology and utilitarianism, the boundary between truth and white lies.
Noa, Haru, and Mio discuss the relationship between habit and freedom. Is repetition bondage or liberation?
Mio speaks unusually long. Together with Haru, Noa, and Simon, they consider the quest for self and the mystery of identity.
Haru and Simon discuss the identity of the self changing through time. Is yesterday's self the same person as today's self?
Ren, Haru, and Mio consider the essence of decision. Not just choosing options, but what makes a decision a decision.
Haru, Noa, and Simon discuss the temporality of happiness. Why don't happy moments last long?
Haru, Simon, and Ren consider why justice and correctness create conflict. If truth is one, why do fights occur?
Ren and Noa debate the relationship between reason and emotion. Do they oppose or cooperate with each other?
Is trust a rational judgment or an emotional gamble? Haru, Ren, and Noa explore the grounds for trusting people.
Haru, Simon, and Noa explore the influence of others' gazes on the self. Am I determined by others' evaluations?
Ren, Noa, and Mio explore why misfortune is more memorable than happiness, from psychological and philosophical perspectives.
Considering the balance between emotion and reason, and human limitations.
Thinking existentially about relationships with others and the meaning of coexistence.
Thinking about the essence and limits of empathy, revolving around emotional sharing.
Discussing the meaning of the past and reinterpretation of memory in the library.
Thinking about the mind-body problem and the location of consciousness between science and philosophy.
Thinking about possibilities between determinism and free will.
Debating the tension between order and freedom, and the necessity of rules.
Thinking about the mechanism of comparison with others and self-evaluation, and the curse of comparison.
Friends discuss the freedom and weight of responsibility that comes with making choices.
Thinking about the relativity and universality of moral values from a multicultural perspective.
Before the cherry blossoms, Haru and Noa debate the basis of aesthetic judgment. Is beauty objective or subjective?
Simon questions the meaning of forgiveness, and Haru and Noa consider the relationship between forgiveness, justice, and freedom.
Triggered by Mio's silence, Haru and Ren contemplate the relationship between the need for recognition and existence.
As Simon questions the effectiveness of justice, Ren and Haru consider the relationship between justice and salvation.
Around different interpretations of the same event, Haru, Ren, Noa, and Simon debate the singularity and plurality of truth.
Seeing Simon's multilingual ability, Haru and Ren debate the limits and possibilities of language.
Seeing Mio choose to be alone, Haru and Ren debate the value and dangers of solitude.
From Haru's experience of disappointment in a friend, Ren and Noa contemplate the dual nature of expectations.
Seeing Noa's contradictory behavior, Haru and Simon debate human consistency and contradiction.
While staring in a mirror, Haru and Mio contemplate methods of self-awareness. They explore introspection, feedback from others, inference from behavior, and the limits of self-knowledge.
From casual conversation, Haru and Mio contemplate the existence of 'true feelings.' They explore the limits of self-awareness, the influence of the unconscious, and what the true self really is.
Triggered by a history lesson, Haru and Ren debate the universality and relativity of morality. They consider cultural differences, changes over time, and the foundation of ethics.
While looking up at the night sky, Haru and Ren debate the meaning of existence. They explore material versus conceptual existence, subjective and objective, and the basis of existence.
Over a promise with a friend, Haru and Noa contemplate the nature of belief. They explore belief, trust, evidence, and the rationality and irrationality of believing.
While staring at a clock, Haru and Ren debate the nature of time. Is the flow of time illusion or reality? They explore the relationship of past, present, and future, and the mystery of time perception.
During a discussion, Ren asks 'Why are people so obsessed with correctness?' They explore the desire for truth, the craving for order, and what lies deep in the heart that seeks correctness.
In a moment of choice, Haru and Ren debate the existence of free will. They explore determinism, compatibilism, and the meaning of freedom.
From a discussion about the placebo effect, Haru and Noa debate the relationship between belief and reality. They explore how perception affects reality, self-fulfilling prophecies, and the power of the mind.
At an art museum, Haru and Simon debate the nature of value over a painting. They explore objective versus subjective value, market versus individual, and the criteria for value judgments.
Haru and Noa contemplate the relationship between emotions and reason. Do emotions cloud judgment, or illuminate the path to truth? The possibility of integrating reason and emotion.
Inspired by Mio's quietness, Simon and Haru contemplate the cessation and deepening of thought. Meditation, intuition, pre-linguistic experience. Is not thinking non-thought, or another form of thought?
Ren and Simon contemplate the relationship between language and reality. Do words describe the world, or construct it? Wittgenstein, Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, and the limits of language.
As Haru avoids making a decision, Ren and Simon debate the ethics of inaction. Is not choosing an escape from responsibility, or a statement of position?
Ren and Noa debate the limits of understanding others. Differences between empathy, sympathy, and projection. Is complete understanding possible, or is the attempt itself valuable?
As Haru struggles with her future path, Noa and Ren contemplate the difficulty of choice. Uncertainty, limits of information, plurality of values. Is hesitation weakness, or honesty?
Simon and Ren debate the boundaries of freedom. Exploring the relationship between free will, responsibility, and social constraints. Is freedom unlimited, or is it defined through relationships with others?
As Ren and Haru debate the definition of correctness, they explore differences between truth, ethics, and context-dependency. Is correctness absolute, or does it change with circumstances?
Noa and Simon contemplate the definition of happiness. Pleasure, fulfillment, meaning. Is happiness subjective, or are there objective criteria?
As Simon questions the significance of philosophy, Haru and Noa consider the relationship between thought and happiness. They explore knowing, thinking, and the meaning of living.
While watching the sunset, Haru and Noa discuss the essence of beauty. They explore subjectivity and objectivity, sensation and reason, and the universality of aesthetic experience.
As Simon and Haru discuss differences in cultural background, they consider the possibilities and limits of understanding others. They explore empathy, imagination, and the role of humility.
As Ren speaks about determinism, Haru and Noa consider the scope and limits of free will. They explore causality, responsibility, and the meaning of choice.
As Ren talks about neuroscience, Haru and Mio consider the location of the self. They explore body and consciousness, matter and subjectivity, and the boundaries of the ego.
Through grading a test, Haru and Ren discuss the ownership of correctness. They explore objective truth and subjective interpretation, the role of authority, and the sharing of knowledge.
While observing Mio's silence, Haru and Noa consider emotions that can't be verbalized. They explore qualia, introspection, and the limits of expression.
Simon presents cultural relativism, and Ren and Noa debate the universality of morality. They explore cultural diversity and human commonality, and the foundation of ethical judgment.
While observing the mostly silent Mio, Haru and Simon consider the meaning silence holds. They explore words and silence, presence and absence, and the essence of communication.
As Haru capriciously chooses a path to walk, Ren and Simon discuss the relationship between reason and freedom. They explore rationality, intuition, and the justification of choice.